How to Cheat on MySpace

Ever wonder how people rack up ungodly numbers of friends on MySpace? Many of them game the system by using “friend adders.” Essentially, they strike a Faustian bargain with a huge pool of other members also wanting to boost their numbers, to trick casual visitors into thinking they’re more popular than they really are. But how do they find other members willing to participate in the deception?

Google “friend adder” and you’ll quickly see that this is not an underground phenomenon. It reminds me of the days, where artists were paid monthly based on how many plays they got. There was big money to be made, so artists teamed up to help each other out. The technically savvy found more devious ways to rack up millions of plays, generating thousands – even tens of thousands – of dollars per month. Even a relative unknown like Color Theory took in $1600 over a year and a half (yes, legitimately). In contrast, today Rhapsody and Lala shell out a penny per stream.

Getting back to the topic at hand, most of the friend adders I’ve seen work the same way. They display a list of their members with “add to friends” links, which work just like the links on their MySpace profile pages. You click the link, confirm the add, and move on to the next. Each time you add somebody, you earn one point. The users with the most points at the end of the day move to the top of the list, which will give them the most adds the next day. Alternately, you can skip the tedium and go to the top of the list by paying for a “featured listing.”

Ironically (or justly, depending on your point of view), there’s even a site that games the friend adder sites! It automates the process to earn credits on a bunch of different adder sites at once, but supposedly it could get you banned from those sites or even from MySpace.

Unfortunately, the gaming extends beyond friend requests. You can buy $35 software to automate mass comments, messages, you name it. And it’s not just MySpace. You can do the same thing on Facebook, Bebo, even YouTube. For example, you can automatically send friend requests to all the members of a Facebook group with a accompanying note about how you share the same interests. In short, this is not the level playing field for artists that we were promised the internet would provide.

So where does that leave me? I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t curious to see what an extra 10,000 friends might do for sales and search engine rankings. When you really think about it, it’s not like I’m in the habit of turning down friend requests from people I don’t know. Hmm…

Actually, I do turn down friend requests from porn merchants, which brings me to my possibly flawed method of detecting gamers. When you find a profile with 2000 or more of what you consider unlikely friends, click the “view all friends” link. If half of the pics that come up are girls in bikinis or less, you’ll know why.

You Might Also Like


  • Reply
    December 8, 2008 at 1:18 am

    Good post. I feel like this is something that often flies under the radar. I’m not going to lie I’ve “experimented” with several myspace friend adders in the past, but as of late have gone for the au natural approach. I’m releasing a new record in the next few months and I certainly don’t want to be at a disadvantage to others who are automating their approach. I don’t know. It’s a tough call. Thanks for the interesting post.

  • Reply
    Jim Offerman
    December 8, 2008 at 5:53 am

    Yet another reason why the number of MySpace friends is a poor measure to gauge an artist’s popularity or marketability (music execs, take note please! :P)

  • Reply
    youtube friend adder
    December 11, 2008 at 4:20 pm

    I’m releasing a new record in the next few months and I certainly don’t want to be at a disadvantage to others who are automating their approach.

  • Reply
    May 3, 2010 at 4:49 am

    Mysace is dead it seems, at least judging by the number of comments this post has drawn. I came here from the online – only promotion post, and though this one here seems rather dead I want to add my quota. I don´t believe automatic approach has or gives you any advantage. From what I read here, you´d be adding only bands who are eager to add as many friends as possible, no matter who or how. They wont look at yout profile, they wont give you a play. The´ll just add anyone automatically and the only profile they´ll be looking at is their own, to see the numbers growing. Haphazard adding may result in some small percentage of real visitors and plays, and a small percentage of them may even buy. And a small percentage of 10 000 is more that a small percentage of 1000, agreed. But I think it´s a waste of time and effort. 10 friends, who you added because they seem to have the “right” taste in music, or who added you because they really liked you or your music are worth a lot more that 10 000 friends who don´t care a bit. The only ones who profit are the companies selling the software (see post above, advertisment for a friendadder system).

  • Reply
    Brian Hazard
    May 3, 2010 at 5:26 pm

    While it might have been worth the time and effort a couple years ago, there’s no point anymore. People have moved on. I always get a chuckle when I visit a band page with 3000+ “friends” and no comments in the past month.

  • Share Your Thoughts